HUMAN NAME · NOT ON THE REGISTRY
Charleston
A human name, held in the Social Security file. It is not in the Administration’s index of agent names, and it has no classification.
| Sex | Female |
|---|---|
| 2025 rank | 3,261 |
| 2025 number | 48 |
| Peak year | 2015 |
| Peak rank | 1,745 |
| Years present | 96 of 146 |
| Dog licences, New York | 9 |
| Pet licences, Seattle | 1 |
Statement of record
Charleston was given to 48 girls in 2025, ranking 3,261st for the year. It peaked in 2015, when it ranked 1,745th and went to 88 babies. It has appeared in 96 of the 146 years on record. In 2025 it was given to girls and boys in near-equal numbers. It has fallen 625 places since 2020.
Villain probability
70%
Basis: phonetics. Two sibilants, ends on a consonant. The canon has no entry, so this is the sound of the name and nothing else.
Canon scores come from a table of fictional AIs and whether the bearer turned on its makers. Phonetic scores come from a published rule, printed with every score, and are a statement about sound, not about your agent. How the sound is scored.
As recorded on the Social Security card application. Names given to fewer than five babies of a sex in a year are not published, so the file is a floor.